Your Vision

Hello,

I have been very busy lately so not been able to update with any blogs. I am hoping to get back on track and start writing regularly again so here is a short blog to kickstart the process.

When I first started shooting film, I was very much in the ‘I must get it right in the camera’ camp.

There was to be no cropping or editing. Over time I felt this was harsh and although I may have been getting the technical parts right, when I looked at the image it didn’t always match the way I visualised it when I took the shot.

Now this does not bother me nearly as much and I use Snapseed to help me get the image how I visualised it. As I am editing from scans they have already had some manipulation anyway. I demonstrate this with the unedited scan and what I wanted when I took this shot in the two images below.

My basic point is whether you shoot film, digital or any other medium. How much or how little you edit and post-process is your choice. So don’t get hung up over it, be honest with yourself and your audience but above all produce the image that matches your vision.

Image taken on a Fuji GA645 with Fujifilm Velvia 50.

SCAN:

MY VISION:

Get it right in the camera – What does this mean to me?

When I started my journey into learning photography and specifically film photography I felt conflicted in terms of editing  my photos.

On the one hand there were (and still are) many mediocre shots that could do with some editing yet on the other hand I really did not want to spend time sitting in front of a screen ‘improving’ shots when I could be out there taking pictures. I was much more relaxed about this with my digital photos, but when it came to film photos I really pressured myself that I had to get it right in the camera and there should be very little editing or even no editing.

I’m not sure why I put this pressure on myself, did I believe that film photographers did no editing, I think I did. I had never studied the master photographers and at that time when people talked about the decisive moment and the photographs taken by Henri Cartier-Bresson I truly thought that he pressed that shutter once, job done final image. I now know better. (lots already written about this so I won’t dwell)

And now that I am a bit more experienced has anything changed? I think it has. I still truly believe that you have to get it right in the camera but what this means to me has changed. Get it right in camera to me means the right composition with a good standard of metering/exposure. If you don’t have that right then no amount of editing is going to help – as the saying goes you can’t polish a turd

However once the negative has been exposed there are so many variables that it would be inaccurate to say it all took place in the camera. I don’t have a full analogue process (or full understanding of one) but my limited understanding is that how you develop the negative can impact the final look and then how you then crop, dodge & burn print etc in the darkroom can get the result you were looking for.

Post camera I have a very digital workflow, my negatives are lab developed and scanned and as such I don’t have control on the final look. That said there are a few labs now that you can work with to create your scanning preferences. I do own a good film scanner but lack of time and the dread of dust means I don’t use it right now.

So I’m going to stop giving myself a hard time in terms of editing. My aim is for the film I shoot to represent as much as possible the look it gives. I.e. Velvia 50 should have great saturated colours. I do still need to get it right in the camera by my definition but am much more relaxed about edits so long as they keep it true to the original scene and that it represents the film used. It is about having control over my own perceived style and look and not having this look dictated externally.

Now if only I could find some editing software I truly liked…..